Feature
Article
Developing Checklists from
Procedures
Most internal auditors
rely on some sort of checklist when
conducting internal audits. But why do we
use them? Where do they come from? Do they
tell us what we need to know? Let's look
at checklists to discover why they are
used, and how we can better use them to
audit a process or procedure.
What is a Checklist
A checklist is tool used
by internal auditors, which normally
incorporates a series of questions that
an auditor must find the answers to. Each
question correlates to a specific
requirement of the audit criteria.
Checklists often yield a yes or no (pass
or fail) answer and usually have a space
available for noting the evidence
observed, or to write additional follow-up
questions.
Why use a Checklist
There are a number of
reasons to use a checklist. The main
reason is to maintain the integrity of the
audit. The checklist helps the auditor
by:·
- Identifying and
communicating the scope of the
audit·
- Providing a
structured list of points to evaluate
and process·
- Helping to guide the
course of the audit·
- Aiding the pacing of
the audit
The checklist keeps the
auditor on track and ensures that all
aspects of the audited area become
audited. But the checklist is only as good
as the auditor preparation. An
inadequately prepared checklist will do
little to ensure the adequacy of the
audit.
Use of
"Canned" Checklist
There are many ways to
obtain a checklist. One of the easiest is
to visit the web and search for a
checklist. Don't just say
"checklist"; instead say
something like "ISO 9001:2000
checklist" make sure you use the
search engine advanced features and
specify the result must use all the words.
That will greatly limit the amount of
resources you will have listed. One such
site is the ISO 9000 Checklist. See our
Auditor resources section for more
information. Some websites provide
checklists free, and others charge for
them. Usually those that charge will offer
a sample page for free.
The problem with canned
checklists is they, by nature can only
cover the requirements of the standard.
They cannot include the requirements of
your organization's own documentation. If
you want a complete checklist, you will
have to either generate one of your own or
supplement a generic checklist with
questions from your own procedures.
Generating a
Checklist From Procedures
When generating a
checklist based on procedures there is
some information that must be made
first. For each line (or sentence) of the
procedure, ask yourself these questions:
- Who is either
responsible or is performing the
procedure?
- What is this person
doing?
- What evidence would
prove that they are following the
procedure?
Sometimes on a
line-by-line basis, as in this case, the
answers will be revealed in following
lines or paragraphs. The answers to these
questions could form the base of the
checklist. From there you can easily add
follow-up questions to ensure those
performing the procedure do in fact know
it. Other questions can relate to your
organization's document and data control,
or control of quality records. You can
also tie in training or calibration. One
thing though; the auditor must have a copy
of the procedure well in advance and have
sufficient time to develop the checklist.
Putting it Together
Let's look at parts of a
fictitious procedure for Supplier
Monitoring.
Procedure:
-
Suppliers (Categories
1, 2 & 3) are monitored on a
quarterly basis by the Purchasing
Manager (Ref. P7.5).
-
The Quality Manager
is responsible for assembling a report
of nonconformances as a result of
incoming inspection and/or problems
discovered during processing. This
report is created for each supplier
and submitted to the Purchasing
Manager at the end of the third month
of the quarter.
-
The Purchasing
Manager compiles delivery records for
each supplier and includes any
nonconformance for the quarter.
Delivery and nonconformances are
reported per lot and as a percentage
of the total received lot during the
quarter. A copy of the report is sent
to the supplier.
-
Suppliers with less
than two occurrences of late
deliveries and/or nonconformance's are
listed as suppliers in good standing.
-
Suppliers with two or
more occurrences of late deliveries
and/or nonconformance's are listed as
"Probationary Suppliers".
These suppliers are required to submit
SCAR F8.9 corrective action reports
(P8.7) within 30 days. An internal
Quality Alert is also issued to
Receiving Inspection requiring 100%
inspection of all incoming lots from
this supplier.
-
A second quarter of
less than acceptable status will
require the Supplier to attend a
meeting at our plant to discuss
corrective action with our Material
Review Board. A timeline for
corrective action is developed at this
meeting for the Supplier to become
compliant. Failure to fulfill this
timeline removes the Supplier from the
Approved Supplier List. The Supplier
can only be re-added to the list after
evaluation as a new Supplier, see
P7.5.*
*Procedure
courtesy of MMTC
In this example, your
checklist may begin with these questions:
- Who is responsible
for monitoring supplier performance?
- How often does the
monitoring take place?
- What factors are
monitored?
- When is a supplier
considered probationary?
These are examples of
questions that may be asked. It is
important that you generate your own
questions based on your own procedures.
Your checklist should cover the entire
procedure and include all applicable forms
and work instructions. Note that the
questions should become fairly obvious as
you read the procedure. The questions
should also be simple for the auditees to
understand. Don't try to make your
questions sound "official". The
simpler the language, the greater chance
you and the auditee will both know what
you are asking.
Using the Checklist
When using the checklist
pay attention to what the auditee is
telling you. They might not know the name
or number of a form, but might be able to
quickly grab one, or describe it. The
audit is not intended to determine if the
auditee knows all forms and documentation
by number, but if the auditee is able to
perform the procedure.
Summary:
Developing checklists
from procedures can be time consuming. It
requires the auditor to study the
procedures ahead of time and generate a
checklist based on that examination. In
some organizations this work is done for
the auditor by someone else. I often
recommend that this be accomplished as the
procedure is being written. That way the
procedure writer takes performance
effectiveness into account during the
development of the procedure. There is no
requirement to use a checklist. But if you
use one, make sure it accurately reflects
what you do, not just what the standard
says.
As always...Good
Auditing!
|